Does Canvas allow faculty to track students online?

January 13, 2021

Learning management systems like Canvas do allow faculty to see some student activity. But a UM-Dearborn Canvas support specialist says it’s far from being a surveillance system.

A collage graphic representing the surveillance issues in remote learning, featuring elements like a computer, webcam, smart phone and an all-seeing eye.
A collage graphic representing the surveillance issues in remote learning, featuring elements like a computer, webcam, smart phone and an all-seeing eye.
Graphic by Violet Dashi

UM-Dearborn’s Coordinator of Digital Education Chris Casey isn’t all that surprised that the pivot to remote learning has inspired some rumors about the surveillance powers of learning management systems like Canvas. In fact, busting myths about the kinds of student activity Canvas can and can’t track has become a pretty frequent activity for him.

One of the ideas Casey hears most often is that if a student is logged into their Canvas account, faculty can see if they open other browser tabs or websites outside of Canvas. “This one is definitely false,” Casey says. The basic idea here is that a student could be taking a quiz in Canvas in one tab or browser, while in another, seeking out answers through Google or sites like Chegg (more on Chegg below). If faculty could see which other tabs were open, they could potentially identify academic integrity violations. But Casey says Canvas simply doesn’t have this capability.

Another thing he hears a lot: Faculty can see when students have viewed a video. “This one is a bit murkier, but it’s mostly true.” It’s somewhat of a gray area because there are different kinds of video that can be viewed in Canvas. If faculty are simply posting a YouTube link, then no, the instructor can’t see which students are watching it. “But if they use the integrated video system in Canvas to, say, post a lecture, faculty can see which students have viewed it, how much of the video they watched, and if they rewatched a video,” Casey says.

A headshot of University Coordinator of Digital Education Chris Casey
A headshot of University Coordinator of Digital Education Chris Casey
Chris Casey, Coordinator of Digital Education

The main intention of this feature is to help faculty do end-of-semester course improvement. For example, if faculty can correlate viewing certain content with better grades, or conversely, conclude that a video didn’t help students much, then they would know what content to keep and what to revise. But he says, in practice, some faculty use this feature to incentivize watching videos — giving students points if Canvas registers that they’ve watched. For several reasons, though, Casey says this isn’t a best practice. Most obviously, students can play videos while scrolling through Instagram and still get full credit. Even more problematic: Some common ad blocking and privacy extensions are known to anonymize student Canvas identities, meaning a student could watch a video and not get the credit. Furthermore, if students were watching the video in a small group, then only the student who was logged in through Canvas would show up as having watched. Because of this murkiness, Casey says faculty are discouraged from awarding points based on viewing videos.

Finally, the other big myth he often has to bust is that faculty can see if students have posted on Chegg. If you’re not familiar with Chegg, it’s an educational technology website that’s a little notorious in the higher education world because students have been known to use its forums to cheat on assignments and exams. But Casey says this one is indeed false. “Well, I should say false with an asterisk.” Casey says it’s false because Canvas does not allow faculty to directly correlate a student account with a student’s Chegg account. The one caveat is that some faculty have started personalizing questions on assignments and tests. “So the students might all get the same basic question, but one number in the equation might be different for each student.” This essentially gives the question an ID tag that’s correlated with each student. And if the instructor searches Chegg forums and sees that that question has been posted, it could be interpreted as evidence of an academic integrity violation.

Casey says folks in his office and instructional designers at The Hub generally discourage this kind of approach. “It can definitely devolve into a kind of academic integrity arms race,” he says. “And that’s not the kind of environment we think is most conducive to learning. Ultimately, we think a big part of the solution will be to change the way that assessment is done. If we have more authentic assessments, and fewer multiple choice tests, we can deal with a lot of these academic integrity issues while improving education.”

Casey says people in his office understand that paradigm shift is not going to happen overnight, and certainly not while many faculty are scrambling to adjust to all the other nuances of a remote learning environment. But for anyone who’s interested, he says they’re always here to help.


The UM-Dearborn community is committed to promoting academic integrity at the university. For more on this topic, check out some other perspectives from faculty and student government. The Office of Digital Education also recently worked with Student Government and The Hub to create a new privacy statement for Canvas. You can find it under “Getting Started With Canvas” on the main student Canvas support page. And as always, if you’re a faculty member who wants to do more with your online course, you can schedule an appointment with one of the instructional designers at The Hub.

Back to top of page